NCAA DII West Region XC Championships

9034 Welcome to the online home of the 2017 NCAA Division II Men's and Women's West Region Cross Country Championships, which will be hosted by Western Oregon University on Saturday, November 4 at the Ash Creek Preserve in Monmouth, Ore.

2017 NCAA Division II West Region Cross Country Championships
Saturday, November 4, 2017
Ash Creek Preserve, Monmouth, Ore.

>>> LIVE VIDEO OF THE RACES
>>> RESULTS

10:00 a.m. - Women's 6,000-meter Race (COURSE MAP)
11:15 a.m. - Men's 10,000-meter race (COURSE MAP)

Regional host sites:
Atlantic Regional: Lock Haven University (Lock Haven, Pa.)
Central Regional: University of Nebraska-Kearney (Kearney, Neb.)
Midwest Regional: Cedarville University (Cedarville, Ohio)
South Regional: Florida Southern University (Lakeland, Fla.)
South Central Regional: West Texas A&M University (Canyon, Texas)
Southeast Regional: Wingate University (Wingate, N.C.)
West Regional: Western Oregon University (Monmouth, Ore.)		 2017 NCAA Championships
Saturday, November 18
Angel Mounds Cross Country Course
Evansville, Indiana

NCAA Division II Men's Cross Country Home Page
NCAA Division II Women's Cross Country Home Page
NCAA.com Championship Central


2016 NCAA DII Championship Results
November 5, 2016 at Slippery Rock
Women's 6K Results | Men's 10K Results

2016 NCAA DII West Region Results
November 5, 2016 at Montana State University Billings
Men's & Women's Results
Men's Conference Results Women's Conference Results
CCAA Results GNAC Results Pac West Results CCAA Results GNAC Results Pac West Results
TEAM SCORES
1. Chico State, 18
2. Cal Poly Pomona, 63
3. Cal St. San Marcos, 109
4. Cal St. East Bay, 114
5. UC San Diego, 117

INDIVIDUALS
1. Medina, Chico, 24:16
2. Fisher, Chico, 24:23
3. Rominguez, CPP, 24:30
4. Kassa, Chico, 24:35
5. Johnson, Chico, 24:35		 TEAM SCORES
1. Western Ore., 51
2. Alaska Anchorage, 64
3. Simon Fraser, 70
4. Western Wash., 76
5. NW Nazarene, 160

INDIVIDUALS
1. Ribich, WOU, 24:45
2. Kangogo, UAA, 25:03
3. Kemboi, UAA, 25:18
4. Jorgensson, SFU, 25:23
5. Miller, SFU, 25:28		 TEAM SCORES
1. Cal Baptist, 24
2. Acad, of Art, 64
3. Biola, 90
4. Azusa Pacific, 111
5. Fresno State, 130

INDIVIDUALS
1. Hartzenburg, CBU, 24:53
2. Porter, APU, 24:55
3. Airiou, AA, 25:09
4. Detourbe, CBU, 25:19
5. Berdard, CBU, 25:34		 TEAM SCORES
1. Chico State, 37
2. Cal St. San Marcos, 78
3. Cal State Pomona, 107
4. Humboldt State, 127
5. San Francisco State, 130

INDIVIDUALS
1. Dorman, Chico, 20:50
2. Rodriguez, CSUSM, 21:06
3. Fernandez, CPP, 21:09
4. Burkhart, Chico, 21:13
5. Flora, CSUSM, 21:13		 TEAM SCORES
1. Alaska Anchorage, 28
2. Simon Fraser, 65
3. Western Wash., 87
4. Seattle Pacific, 93
5. Central Wash., 163

INDIVIDUALS
1. Kurgat, UAA, 20:49
2. Charleson, SPU, 21:45
3. Howley, SFU, 21:52
4. Jepchumba, UAA. 21:53
5. McCormick, UAA, 22:06		 TEAM SCORES
1. Cal Baptist, 22
2. Acad, of Art, 76
3. Biola, 81
4. Dixie State, 142
5. Point Loma, 142

INDIVIDUALS
1. Delanis, CBU, 21:11
2. Somogyi, CBU, 21:28
3. Phelippeau, AA
4. Benoit-Bucher, PLU, 21:44
5. Robinson, CBU, 21:50
Qualifying Information:
Teams and individuals qualify for the national championships based on their performances throughout the season as well as automatic bids in the regional meets. A total of 32 teams and 24 individuals will be selected. The process for allocating the berths is outlined below:
Teams (32)
  • The top three teams from each regional meet will automatically advance to the NCAA Championships finals (24 total teams).
  • Additional team allocations (eight) are awarded based on the following: Click here for formula (page 1-3)
Individuals (24 minimum)
  • The top two individuals who are not part of a qualifying team will automatically advance to the championship (16 individuals).
  • All individuals who finish in the top five at the regional meet and are not part of a qualifying team automatically advance to the championship finals.
  • The next eight individuals will be selected at-large. There is no limit to the number of at-large individuals that may be selected from the same region. The top individual from each region not receiving an automatic qualifying spot and not on a qualifying team, will be compared head-to-head. Place at the regional meet and strength of region are factored into the formula when comparing at-large individuals using the following: Click here for equation (page 4)